Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:26:31 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <1623623631.823.1711643191006@ip-10-30-146-46.us-west-2.compute.internal>
Subject: Exported From Confluence
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/related;
boundary="----=_Part_822_1293018229.1711643191005"
------=_Part_822_1293018229.1711643191005
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Location: file:///C:/exported.html
2.1: Experiment F - Flow Subsystem Burst Throughput
2.1: Experiment F - Flow Subsystem Burst Throughput
System Env:
- Server: Dual XeonE5-2670 v2 2.5GHz; 64GB DDR3; 512GB SSD
- System clock precision is +/- 1 ms
- 1Gbps NIC
- JAVA_OPTS=3D"${JAVA_OPTS:--Xms8G -Xmx8G}"
ONOS Apps:
ONOS Config:
- cfg set org.onosproject.provider.nil.NullProviders deviceCount 35
- cfg set org.onosproject.provider.nil.NullProviders topoShape linear
- cfg set org.onosproject.provider.nil.NullProviders enabled true
"Constant-Load" Test Conditions:
- F =3D eventually consistent flows rule - 122500, 10000 with FlowObj - t=
otal # of flows installed
- N: # of neighboring ONOS's for flows to be installed when ONOS1 is the =
server installing flows
- S: #servers installing flows
- SW =3D 35 - total # of switches (Null Devices) connected to ONOS cluste=
r evenly distributed to active ONOS nodes
- FL: # flows to be installed on each switch
Command:
- python3 $ONOS_ROOT/tools/tests/bin/flow-tester.py -f FL -n N -s servers=
Note: Error bars in the graphs below represent standard deviations. Only=
the upper error bars are shown.
Following graphs include results using flow rule stores with both strong=
consistency and eventual consistency models. The ONOS team is still workin=
g on performance improvements for flow rule store with strong consistency.<=
/p>
------=_Part_822_1293018229.1711643191005--