Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Published from Jenkins build: https://onos-jenkins.onlab.us/job/HAsanity/17/

...

commit 971b2eb7e4d40ec68d1a1683060cc233c750d1f2 2aa406886feab49890cadf0bf33353ea36c2ec62 (HEAD, origin/master, origin/HEAD, master)
Author: Madan Jampani Jonathan Hart [madan@onlabjono@onlab.us]
AuthorDate: Sun Mon Aug 2 143 10:4753:52 51 2015 +0530-0700
Commit: Madan Jampani [madan@onlabGerrit Code Review [gerrit@onlab.us]
CommitDate: Sun Tue Aug 2 144 03:4724:52 41 2015 +0530
Reenable consistent notification support0000

Modify 'onos-setup-karaf clean' to copy package configs
HTML
<iframe src="https://onos-jenkins.onlab.us/job/HAsanity/plot/Plot-HA/getPlot?index=0&width=500&height=300"noborder="0" width="500" height="300" scrolling="yes" seamless="seamless"></iframe>

...

  • 8.1 Comparing ONOS topology to MN - No Result (warning)
  • 8.2 Collecting topology information from ONOS - PASS (tick)
  • 8.3 Hosts view is consistent across all ONOS nodes - PASS (tick)
  • 8.4 Hosts information is correct - PASS (tick)
  • 8.5 Host attachment points to the network - PASS (tick)
  • 8.6 Clusters view is consistent across all ONOS nodes - PASS (tick)
  • 8.7 There is only one SCC - PASS (tick)
  • 8.8 Device information is correct - PASS (tick)
  • 8.9 Links are correct - PASS (tick)
  • 8.10 Hosts are correct - PASS (tick)
  • 8.11 Checking ONOS nodes - PASS (tick)

Case 21: Assigning Controller roles for switches -

...

PASS

Check that ONOS is connected to each device. Then manually assign mastership to specific ONOS nodes using 'device-role'

  • 21.1 Assign mastership of switches to specific controllers - PASS (tick)
  • 21.2 Check mastership was correctly assigned - FAIL (error)
    • Switches were not successfully reassigned
  • PASS (tick)

Case 8: Compare ONOS Topology view to Mininet topology - PASS

...

  • 10.1 Bring link between s3 and s28 back up - PASS (tick)

Case 8: Compare ONOS Topology view to Mininet topology -

...

PASS

Compare topology objects between Mininet and ONOS

  • 8.1 Comparing ONOS topology to MN - No Result (warning)
  • 8.2 Collecting topology information from ONOS - PASS (tick)
  • 8.3 Hosts view is consistent across all ONOS nodes - PASS (tick)
  • 8.4 Hosts information is correct - PASS (tick)
  • 8.5 Host attachment points to the network - PASS (tick)
  • 8.6 Clusters view is consistent across all ONOS nodes - PASS (tick)
  • 8.7 There is only one SCC - PASS (tick)
  • 8.8 Device information is correct - PASS (tick)
  • 8.9 Links are correct - FAIL (error)
  • Links are incorrect
  • PASS (tick)
  • 8.10 Hosts are correct - PASS (tick)
  • 8.11 Checking ONOS nodes - PASS (tick)

...

Case 11: Killing a switch to ensure it is discovered correctly - PASS

  • 11.1 Kill s5 - PASS (tick)

Case 8: Compare ONOS Topology view to Mininet topology - PASS

Compare topology objects between Mininet and ONOS

...

Case 12: Adding a switch to ensure it is discovered correctly - PASS

  • 12.1 Add back s5 - PASS (tick)

Case 8: Compare ONOS Topology view to Mininet topology -

...

FAIL

Compare topology objects between Mininet and ONOS

  • 8.1 Comparing ONOS topology to MN - No Result (warning)
  • 8.2 Collecting topology information from ONOS - PASS (tick)
  • 8.3 Hosts view is consistent across all ONOS nodes - PASS (tick)
  • 8.4 Hosts information is correct - PASS (tick)
  • 8.5 Host attachment points to the network - PASS (tick)
  • 8.6 Clusters view is consistent across all ONOS nodes - PASS (tick)
  • 8.7 There is only one SCC - PASS (tick)
  • 8.8 Device information is correct - PASS (tick)
  • 8.9 Links are correct - PASS (tick)FAIL (error)
    • Links are incorrect
  • 8.10 Hosts are correct - PASS (tick)
  • 8.11 Checking ONOS nodes - PASS (tick)

...