Page History

...

Overview

The Intent Framework is a subsystem that allows applications to specify their network control desires in form of policy rather than mechanism. We refer to these policy-based directives as intents. The ONOS core accepts the intent specifications and translates them, via intent compilation, into installable intents, which are essentially actionable operations on the network environment. These actions are carried out by intent installation process, which results in some changes to the environment, such as tunnel links being provisioned, flow rules being installed on the data-planea switch, or optical lambdas (wavelengths) being reserved.

Although the ONOS core provides a suite of built-in intents and their compilers and installers, the intent framework is designed to be extensible. It allows additional intents and their compilers or installers to be added to ONOS dynamically at run-time. This allows others to enhance the initial arsenal of connectivity and policy-based intents available in ONOS by default.

Intents

An Intent is an immutable model object that describes an application's request to the ONOS core to alter the network's behavior. At the lowest levels, Intents may be described in terms of:

...

In addition, Intents are always identified by both the ApplicationId of the application that submitted it, and a unique IntentId, generated at creation. 

Intent Compilation

State Machine

The following diagram depicts the state transition diagram for the compilation process of each top-level intent:

Image RemovedImage Added

The states depicted in orange are transitional and are expected to last only a brief amount of time. The rest of the states are parking states where the Intent may spent spend some time. The exception is the Submitted state, where the intent may pause briefly while:

• the system determines where to perform the compilation, or
• it performs global recomputation/optimization across all prior intents.

General Operation

After an intent is submitted by an application, it will be sent immediately (but asynchronously) into a compiling phase, then to the installing phase, and finally, to the installed state. An intent may also be withdrawn if an application decides that it no longer wishes for the intent to hold.

The rest of the states account for various issues that may arise:

• An application may ask for an objective that is not currently achievable, e.g. connectivity across to unconnected network segments. In this case, the compiling phase may fail. A change in the environment that results in the objectives being met can trigger a transition back to the compiling state.
• The installing phase may be disrupted. In this case, the framework will attempt to recompile the intent to see if an alternate approach is available. If recompilation succeeds, it will return to the installing phase.
• A loss of throughput or connectivity may impact the viability of a successfully compiled and installed intent. In this case, the framework will attempt to recompile the intent, and if an alternate approach is available, its installation will be attempted. 

The failure mode for the above cases is the failed state. 

The Intent framework relies on the Java Future for handling the asynchronous intent compilation process. 

Compilers and Installers

Intents are ultimately compiled down into a set of FlowRule model objects. The process may include:

...

The IntentManager coordinates the compilation and installation of FlowRules by managing the invocation of available IntentCompilers and IntentInstallers.

FlowRule Installation

FlowRuleBatchOperations are handed off to the FlowRuleService to be written down as protocol-specific messages. In the case of OpenFlow, the OpenFlowRuleProvider is responsible for generating OFFlowMod messages from FlowRules, and sending it to the appropriate network switch. It relies on the OpenFlow subsystem for its message factories and OpenFlowSwitch references for this task.

...

Previous : Clustering
Next : GUI Architecture

...